Sharia is the Islamic understanding of God's guidance for human life, drawn from the Quran and the teaching of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). The word means "the path" or "the way to water." Most of it concerns prayer, fasting, charity, ethics, family life and fair dealing. Criminal law is a small, heavily restricted part of it.
In Western news, "sharia law" usually appears beside images of harsh punishments. Some governments do apply sharia-based penal codes, but that picture leaves out how Muslims use the word, how scholars build rulings, and how much practice varies between countries.
Key takeaways
- Sharia literally means "path," and the Quran uses a related word when it says God put the Prophet "on an ordained way" (Quran 45:18).
- Sharia is the divine ideal; fiqh is the human, fallible attempt by jurists to understand it, which is why there are several schools of Islamic law.
- Classical jurists such as al-Ghazali and al-Shatibi taught that sharia aims to protect five things: religion, life, intellect, family lineage and property.
- The Quran sets very high standards of proof for some crimes, such as four witnesses for an accusation of adultery (Quran 24:4), and historians such as Rudolph Peters note these punishments were rarely carried out.
- In Pew Research Center's 2013 survey of Muslims in 39 countries, support for sharia as official law ranged from 8% in Azerbaijan to 99% in Afghanistan, and most supporters said it should apply only to Muslims.
What does sharia mean?
Sharia (shari'ah, شريعة) comes from an Arabic root used for a path leading to water, the thing desert life depends on. Muslims use it for the whole of God's guidance: belief, worship, family, honest trade and settling disputes.
Then We put you, [O Muhammad], on an ordained way concerning the matter [of religion]; so follow it and do not follow the inclinations of those who do not know.
For a believer, sharia is less a legal code than a way of living. A Muslim who prays, gives charity or keeps a promise is following sharia just as much as a judge applying a rule.
What is the difference between sharia and fiqh?
This distinction clears up much of the confusion. Sharia is the ideal path as God knows it. Fiqh (fiqh, فقه), which means "understanding," is the body of rulings that human scholars derive from the sources. Fiqh can be mistaken, can change with circumstances and often contains several valid opinions on the same question.
| Term | Meaning | Who produces it | Can it differ or change? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharia | God's guidance for human life as a whole | Revealed through the Quran and the Prophet's example | Muslims see the ideal as fixed |
| Fiqh | Jurists' understanding of that guidance in detail | Human scholars | Yes; schools and scholars disagree |
| Fatwa | A scholar's opinion answering a specific question | An individual scholar (mufti) | Yes; it is not binding on everyone |
| Qanun | State law passed by a government | Rulers and parliaments | Yes; it varies by country |
Sunni Islam has four major schools of fiqh, the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali, and Shia Islam has the Ja'fari school. When a headline says "sharia requires X," the more accurate statement is often "one school, or one government, interprets sharia as requiring X."
Where does sharia come from?
Sunni legal theory names four main sources, used in this order of authority:
- The Quran, which Muslims believe is God's word. Only a few hundred of its verses deal directly with legal matters.
- The Sunnah, the Prophet's teaching and practice, preserved in hadith collections. Our guide to what hadith is explains how these reports were checked.
- Ijma (consensus), the agreement of qualified scholars on a ruling.
- Qiyas (analogy), applying an existing ruling to a new case that shares the same reason. A classic example is extending the prohibition of wine to other intoxicants.
Scholars also weigh public interest, local custom and the need to avoid harm, and Shia jurists give a larger role to reason and to the teachings of the Imams. For the beliefs beneath all of this, see what Islam is.
What are the objectives of sharia?
Classical jurists asked why the rules exist, not only what they say. The theologian al-Ghazali (d. 1111) and the Andalusian jurist al-Shatibi (d. 1388) set out what became known as the maqasid al-shari'ah, the higher objectives of sharia. They identified five necessities that the law protects:
- Religion (din): freedom to believe and worship.
- Life (nafs): the prohibition of murder and the duty to preserve health.
- Intellect ('aql): the prohibition of intoxicants and the value of learning.
- Lineage and family (nasl): rules on marriage and children.
- Property (mal): the prohibition of theft and fraud, and fair contracts.
Many modern scholars use the maqasid to argue that a ruling which causes injustice or hardship has been misapplied. The Quran frames the whole project in terms of justice:
Indeed, Allah orders justice and good conduct and giving to relatives and forbids immorality and bad conduct and oppression. He admonishes you that perhaps you will be reminded.
What does sharia actually cover?
Classical law books have two halves: 'ibadat (acts of worship), covering purity, prayer, zakat, fasting and pilgrimage, and mu'amalat (dealings between people), covering trade, inheritance, marriage, divorce, food and judicial procedure.
For most Muslims, sharia means praying on time, eating halal food, paying zakat, avoiding interest and following Islamic rules in a marriage contract or will. None of this requires a state, much like an observant Jew keeping kosher.
What about the harsh punishments?
The Quran prescribes fixed penalties, called hudud (hudud, "limits"), for a small number of offenses, including theft, highway robbery, false accusation of adultery and adultery itself. Amputation for theft appears in Quran 5:38 and flogging for unlawful sex in Quran 24:2. Stoning for adultery by married people is not in the Quran; jurists base it on hadith, and a minority of modern scholars dispute it.
Strict conditions of proof
Classical jurists surrounded these penalties with demanding conditions. Adultery required four adult, upright eyewitnesses to the act itself, or a voluntary confession that could be withdrawn at any time. Anyone who made the accusation without four witnesses was himself punished:
And those who accuse chaste women and then do not produce four witnesses - lash them with eighty lashes and do not accept from them testimony ever after. And those are the defiantly disobedient,
Theft required goods above a minimum value, taken from a secured place, with no element of need. Jurists widely adopted the maxim "avert the hudud punishments by doubts." It is reported as a hadith in Jami at-Tirmidhi, though scholars grade that chain weak; the principle itself became standard. The historian Rudolph Peters, in Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005), observes that these physical punishments were rarely applied in premodern practice. Most crimes fell under discretionary penalties (ta'zir) set by judges.
How some states apply hudud today
It would be misleading to stop there. Several modern states and regions have written hudud into their penal codes, and some carry out these punishments:
- Saudi Arabia and Iran enforce penal codes based on their readings of sharia, including corporal and capital punishments. Human rights groups have documented executions and floggings in both.
- Afghanistan under the Taliban has carried out public floggings and executions since 2021.
- Twelve northern Nigerian states introduced sharia penal codes from 2000 onward. Several stoning sentences were handed down, including against Amina Lawal, whose conviction was overturned on appeal in 2003.
- Brunei introduced a sharia penal code with stoning in 2019, then extended its death-penalty moratorium to it after an outcry.
- Aceh province in Indonesia applies caning for some offenses under local sharia regulations.
Critics, including many Muslim scholars, argue that these states apply the penalties while ignoring the classical safeguards and the maqasid. Supporters say they are restoring divine law. The debate among Muslims is real.
Sharia law countries: how much does each state use it?
No two Muslim-majority countries treat sharia the same way. A rough picture:
| How sharia is used in state law | Examples |
|---|---|
| Basis for most law, including criminal penalties | Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan |
| Penal code includes some hudud, applied unevenly | Pakistan, Sudan, northern Nigerian states, Brunei, Aceh (Indonesia) |
| Mainly family law (marriage, divorce, inheritance) for Muslims | Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Malaysia, most of Indonesia |
| Largely secular legal system | Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Albania, Senegal |
What do Muslims mean when they say they want sharia?
The best data comes from Pew Research Center's 2013 report The World's Muslims, based on more than 38,000 face-to-face interviews in 39 countries. It found:
- Support for making sharia "the official law of the land" varied enormously, from 8% in Azerbaijan to 99% in Afghanistan. Regional medians were 84% in South Asia, 77% in Southeast Asia, 74% in the Middle East and North Africa and 64% in sub-Saharan Africa, but far lower in Central Asia and Southern and Eastern Europe.
- Among supporters, the most popular use was for religious judges to decide family and property disputes.
- Support for severe criminal punishments was lower and uneven. Among sharia supporters, a median of 46% in Southeast Asia backed corporal punishments for crimes like theft, compared with 81% in South Asia.
- In most regions, medians of at least half of supporters said sharia should apply only to Muslims.
In other words, "supporting sharia" can mean anything from wanting an Islamic marriage contract to backing a strict penal code, and in some countries majorities do back harsh punishments. Both facts belong in an honest account.
Is sharia law coming to the West?
Mainstream Islamic teaching says Muslims in the West must keep their agreements, including the laws of the countries they live in (Quran 5:1). Sharia for them is personal practice: prayer, diet, modest dress, Islamic wills and religious marriage.
In the United Kingdom, informal "sharia councils" mainly help women obtain religious divorces. A 2018 independent review for the UK government, chaired by Professor Mona Siddiqui, found they have no legal jurisdiction, found evidence of both good and bad practice, and recommended that Islamic marriages also be registered civilly so women have full legal protection. Similar religious tribunals exist for Jewish and Catholic marriages.
Common myths about sharia
| Myth | What the evidence shows |
|---|---|
| Sharia is mainly a criminal code | Most of it covers worship, ethics, family and commerce |
| Sharia is one fixed rulebook | It is applied through several schools of fiqh that differ on many rulings |
| All Muslims want hudud punishments | Pew found support for harsh penalties varied widely, from minorities to majorities by country |
| Sharia applies to non-Muslims | Classical law and most supporters in Pew's survey limit it to Muslims, with minorities keeping their own laws |
| No state uses harsh punishments | Some states, such as Saudi Arabia, Iran and Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, do |
The question of armed conflict in Islamic law is covered separately in our guide to what jihad means, and broader questions about violence in is Islam a religion of peace?.
Read the verses on Quran Universe
To see how the Quran frames law within justice and mercy, read Surah an-Nahl 16:90 and the legal passages of Surah an-Nur on Quran Universe. Each verse has the Arabic text, the Sahih International translation, word-by-word meanings and Tafsir Ibn Kathir, explained in our guide to what tafsir is. God's name Al-Adl, the Just, is a good companion to that reading.
Frequently asked questions
What is sharia in simple terms?
Sharia is the Islamic idea of God's guidance for how people should live. It covers worship, morals, family life, business and justice. Muslims draw it from the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad's teaching, and scholars interpret it through legal schools. Only a small part of it deals with criminal punishment, and much of it is personal religious practice that needs no government.
What is the difference between sharia and fiqh?
Sharia is God's ideal guidance, which Muslims believe is perfect. Fiqh is the human understanding of that guidance worked out by legal scholars, and it can be mistaken or vary. This is why the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali and Ja'fari schools sometimes reach different rulings on the same question while all claiming to follow sharia.
Which countries use sharia law?
Saudi Arabia, Iran and Taliban-ruled Afghanistan base most of their legal systems on sharia, including criminal penalties. Pakistan, Sudan, Brunei, Aceh in Indonesia and several northern Nigerian states include some sharia penalties. Many other Muslim-majority countries, such as Egypt, Morocco and Malaysia, apply sharia mainly to family law, while Turkey and several Central Asian states are largely secular.
Why do some Muslims want sharia law in the West?
For most Western Muslims, following sharia means praying, eating halal food, dressing modestly and marrying or writing wills according to Islamic rules, all within national law. Some use religious councils for Islamic divorce. Mainstream scholars teach that Muslims in the West must obey the law of the land, so sharia there is a matter of personal religious practice.
Does sharia apply to non-Muslims?
In classical Islamic law, religious minorities kept their own laws for worship and family matters, and many Muslim-majority countries still run separate personal status courts for Christians. In Pew's 2013 survey, medians of at least half of those who supported sharia as official law said it should apply only to Muslims, though views differed by country.
Are hudud punishments common?
Historically, they were rare because the evidence required was so demanding, such as four eyewitnesses for adultery. Today a small number of states, including Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan under the Taliban, carry out such punishments, and human rights organizations document cases. Many Muslim scholars criticize these states for ignoring the classical safeguards.